Recovering discourse relations: Varying influence of discourse adverbials
نویسندگان
چکیده
Discourse relations are a bridge between sentence-level semantics and discourselevel semantics. They can be signalled explicitly with discourse connectives or conveyed implicitly, to be inferred by a comprehender. The same discourse units can be related in more than one way, signalled by multiple connectives. But multiple connectives aren’t necessary: Multiple relations can be conveyed even when only one connective is explicit. This paper describes the initial phase in a larger experimental study aimed at answering two questions: (1) Given an explicit discourse adverbial, what discourse relation(s) do naive subjects take to be operative, and (2) Can this be predicted on the basis of the explicit adverbial alone, or does it depend instead on other factors?
منابع مشابه
Ordering Constraints on Discourse Relations
Recent work investigates the ordering constraints discourse relations impose on texts. Wolf and Gibson (2003) generated GraphBank, a discourse-annotated corpus without a prior constraint to tree-structured annotations, showing that naive annotators generate representations containing multiple-parented nodes and relations with crossing arguments. Webber et al. (2003) hypothesize that discourse m...
متن کاملFilling in the Blanks in Understanding Discourse Adverbials: Consistency, Conflict, and Context-Dependence in a Crowdsourced Elicitation Task
The semantic relationship between a sentence and its context may be marked explicitly, or left to inference. Rohde et al. (2015) showed that, contrary to common assumptions, this isn’t exclusive or: a conjunction can often be inferred alongside an explicit discourse adverbial. Here we broaden the investigation to a larger set of 20 discourse adverbials by eliciting ≈28K conjunction completions ...
متن کاملAnaphora and Discourse Semantics
We argue in this paper that many common adverbial phrases generally taken to be discourse connectives signalling discourse relations between adjacent discourse units are instead anaphors. We do this by (i) demonstrating their behavioral similarity with more common anaphors (pronouns and definite NPs); (ii) presenting a general framework for understanding anaphora into which they nicely fit; (ii...
متن کاملExperiments with Annotating Discourse Relations in the Hindi Discourse Relation Bank
In the Hindi Discourse Relation Bank (HDRB) project, we are developing a large corpus annotated with discourse relations, such as causal, temporal, contrastive and conjunctive relations. Adopting the lexically grounded approach of the Penn Discourse Treebank (PDTB), we annotate the argument structure of both explicit and implicit discourse relations, as well as the senses of relations. We descr...
متن کاملTemporal Discourse Markers And The Flow Of Events
• Temporal discourse markers such as after, before or while are commonly described as triggers for discourse relations expressing a temporal relation (Mann and Thompson, 1987; Knott, 1996). However, only little research has been done regarding the interaction of such discourse markers with the context within a multi-sentence discourse. Lascarides & Oberlander (1993), for instance, note that sen...
متن کامل